On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?
Every audit run adds a dated snapshot — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
This audit of the Buttcoin SPL Token Mint found no critical or high-severity issues based on the provided on-chain facts and market data. Both the mint and freeze authorities have been revoked, indicating a fixed supply and no ability to freeze user accounts. The token utilizes the SPL Token-2022 program without any active transfer hooks or default frozen account states. Holder distribution data was unavailable from chain-native RPC.
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Based on the data, it's not possible to definitively label Buttcoin as a scam, but significant red flags exist. The contract is unverified, meaning its underlying code is opaque, and liquidity is unlocked, creating 'rug pull' potential. While ownership is renounced and no mint function exists, these critical vulnerabilities warrant extreme caution, aligning with a medium risk assessment.
Buttcoin is not considered safe for investment due to critical risks. Its contract is unverified, blocking independent security audits and transparency. More importantly, liquidity is not locked, exposing investors to a 'rug pull' risk. These fundamental vulnerabilities, contributing to its medium risk score of 34/100, mean capital loss is a significant possibility.
No, Buttcoin's contract is unverified on-chain. This means its code cannot be publicly inspected for vulnerabilities or malicious functions. Without contract verification, a meaningful security audit is impossible, leaving investors with no independent assurance regarding the contract's safety or integrity.
Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, no signup required.
Get Detailed Audit