Is Burnie Senders (BURNIE) Safe? Smart Contract Security Analysis

Burnie Senders BURNIE

CGEDT9…pump

Solana Not verifiedLast checked 3d ago 1 audit on record

DexScreener ↗

46 / 100

High Risk

Executive SummaryAI Copilot

The Burnie Senders (BURNIE) token is an SPL Token-2022 mint with both mint and freeze authorities revoked, indicating a fixed supply and no ability to freeze accounts. Metadata is immutable, and no transfer hook or permanent delegate is configured. While chain-native holder distribution data was unavailable, external security signals indicate a low holder concentration. No critical or high-risk vulnerabilities were identified based on the provided on-chain facts and deterministic rules.

1 Informational

Volume 24h

$285.1K

Liquidity

$263.8K

Price

$0.00185

Token Age

4mo

Top 10 Holders

25.4%

Security Findings

1 Info

Info

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

I-01This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

IssueThis token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

FixRead the risk score breakdown below as the substance of this audit. For a code-level review, the token would need an accompanying verified program.

StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium6/10

The Burnie Senders token is implemented using the spl-token-2022 program. Both the mint authority and freeze authority have been revoked, ensuring a fixed supply of 969,658,373.040029 tokens and preventing any account freezing. No transfer hook is active, meaning transfers are not subject to custom on-chain program logic. The default account state is not frozen, allowing new accounts to receive tokens without requiring an unfreeze action.

GovernanceHigh3/10

The token exhibits a low holder concentration, with the top 10 token accounts holding 23.57% of the total supply, which does not indicate significant centralization risk. Total DEX liquidity stands at $195,438, supported by a 24-hour volume of $91,808. The Volume/Liquidity Ratio is 0.47, which is considered normal and does not suggest wash trading. The DEX pair has been active for 122 days, providing a reasonable track record.

UpgradesMedium5/10

The token's core parameters are fixed due to the revocation of both mint and freeze authorities. There is no permanent delegate configured, and the metadata is immutable, preventing changes to the token's name, symbol, or image post-launch. Furthermore, balance mutability, transfer fee upgradability, and transfer hook upgradability are all disabled, ensuring stability of the token's operational characteristics.

Security Checklist

1/4 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

No Mint Function?

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

Liquidity Depth

$287.1K across 12 pairs

PumpswapSOLanalysed$263.8K Meteora DLMMSOL$15.1K Meteora DLMMSOL$6.9K Orca wpUSDC$313 Meteora DYN2Circuit$295 Meteora DLMMSOL$266

Show 4 more pairsShow less

Meteora DLMMUSDC$213 Meteora DLMMSOL$84 Meteora DYN2ANSEM$28 Meteora DYN2RNLD$27

The 2 remaining pairs hold $22 between them and are not listed.

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

What Raised This Score

5 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 20% (25.4% total → 25.4% effective; 25.4% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — mild)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Is Burnie Senders Safe?