The audited contract is a standard ERC-20 token implementation. It follows the OpenZeppelin-style pattern for token logic and contains no privileged administrative functions or complex state-dependent transfer logic. The contract is immutable and poses minimal risk to users.

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is Binance Super CZ a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The audited contract is a standard ERC-20 token implementation.
Read the full analysis- Mint capability UNKNOWN
- Volume/Liquidity > 10×
- Contract source not verified — its logic cannot be read
Exact factors
- Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
- Volume/Liquidity > 10× (12.6× — possible wash trading)
- Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 23Holders
as of audit · Oct 23, 2026- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell13.0%
- Everyone else1,819 holders87.0%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 23, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 23The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.
Security Findings
InfoNo code-level findings — contract source is not verified on the explorer
The contract's source code has not been published or verified on the block explorer, so only its deployed bytecode and on-chain behaviour were available. No source-level vulnerability could be confirmed or ruled out. The assessment on this page rests on LP lock/burn state, holder concentration.I-01
Issue
The contract's source code has not been published or verified on the block explorer, so only its deployed bytecode and on-chain behaviour were available. No source-level vulnerability could be confirmed or ruled out. The assessment on this page rests on LP lock/burn state, holder concentration.
Fix
Treat an unverified contract as unaudited at the code level. Ask the team to verify the source on the explorer, which makes an independent review possible.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 13.0% of supply. What remains: 13.0% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. 1,829 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 13.0% of supply. What remains: 13.0% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. 1,829 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
1,829 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
1,829 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoLiquidity locked, lock term not visible
100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held by TeamFinance, but the lock's end date is not published in the data we can read — its duration is unverified. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held by TeamFinance, but the lock's end date is not published in the data we can read — its duration is unverified. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $205K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $2.6M (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $205K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $2.6M (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $205K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $205K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 23The architecture follows standard ERC-20 patterns, ensuring high compatibility with existing DeFi protocols. Code security is robust due to the use of well-tested library patterns for arithmetic and state management. 7.1 Architecture: Standard; 7.2 Code Security: High; 7.3 Access Control: N/A; 7.6 External: Standard.
There are no governance or economic mechanisms implemented in this contract. 7.4 Economic: N/A; 7.5 Governance: N/A. The token functions purely as a standard asset without inflationary or deflationary mechanics.
The contract is not upgradeable and does not utilize proxy patterns. 7.7 Upgrades: N/A. This ensures the contract logic remains immutable post-deployment.
The contract is secure and follows industry best practices for a standard ERC-20 token.
No further action is required as there are no identified vulnerabilities or administrative risks.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 23, 202655Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Binance Super CZ?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page