Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is Binance Super CZ a Scam?

BSCBNB Chain
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 23, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 10h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The audited contract is a standard ERC-20 token implementation.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Mint capability UNKNOWN
  • Volume/Liquidity > 10×
  • Contract source not verified — its logic cannot be read
Exact factors
  • Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
  • Volume/Liquidity > 10× (12.6× — possible wash trading)
  • Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (10h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 234 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedNot verified
OwnershipUnknown
MintUnknown
Liquidity lockLocked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 23, 20261,829 holders
13.0%Wallets87.0%Everyone else
13.0%Wallets87.0%Everyone else
WalletsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
13.0%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell13.0%
  • Everyone else1,819 holders87.0%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads13.0%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 23, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 23$205.2K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensLocked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.

Analysed pool$205.2KShare of depth100.0%
LP Locked100.0% · TeamFinance

Security Findings

7 Info
Info

No code-level findings — contract source is not verified on the explorer

The contract's source code has not been published or verified on the block explorer, so only its deployed bytecode and on-chain behaviour were available. No source-level vulnerability could be confirmed or ruled out. The assessment on this page rests on LP lock/burn state, holder concentration.I-01

Issue

The contract's source code has not been published or verified on the block explorer, so only its deployed bytecode and on-chain behaviour were available. No source-level vulnerability could be confirmed or ruled out. The assessment on this page rests on LP lock/burn state, holder concentration.

Fix

Treat an unverified contract as unaudited at the code level. Ask the team to verify the source on the explorer, which makes an independent review possible.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 13.0% of supply. What remains: 13.0% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. 1,829 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 13.0% of supply. What remains: 13.0% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. 1,829 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

1,829 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

1,829 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Liquidity locked, lock term not visible

100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held by TeamFinance, but the lock's end date is not published in the data we can read — its duration is unverified. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held by TeamFinance, but the lock's end date is not published in the data we can read — its duration is unverified. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $205K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $2.6M (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $205K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $2.6M (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $205K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $205K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 23
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The audited contract is a standard ERC-20 token implementation. It follows the OpenZeppelin-style pattern for token logic and contains no privileged administrative functions or complex state-dependent transfer logic. The contract is immutable and poses minimal risk to users.

Technical6/10Medium risk

The architecture follows standard ERC-20 patterns, ensuring high compatibility with existing DeFi protocols. Code security is robust due to the use of well-tested library patterns for arithmetic and state management. 7.1 Architecture: Standard; 7.2 Code Security: High; 7.3 Access Control: N/A; 7.6 External: Standard.

Governance8/10Low risk

There are no governance or economic mechanisms implemented in this contract. 7.4 Economic: N/A; 7.5 Governance: N/A. The token functions purely as a standard asset without inflationary or deflationary mechanics.

Upgrades8/10Low risk

The contract is not upgradeable and does not utilize proxy patterns. 7.7 Upgrades: N/A. This ensures the contract logic remains immutable post-deployment.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The contract is secure and follows industry best practices for a standard ERC-20 token.

No further action is required as there are no identified vulnerabilities or administrative risks.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkBNB Chain
Token age10h
Contract0xe552…a3e2
Deployer0x1057…b94c
Badge for your website
Binance Super CZ security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 23, 202655Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Binance Super CZ?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page