Quantum Audit Logo

Is Ava AI Safe?

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page →

Ava AI AVA
DKu9ky…pump
Solana Not verifiedLast checked 2d ago 1 audit on record
Executive SummaryAI Copilot

This audit of the Ava AI (AVA) SPL token mint identifies a significant risk due to high holder concentration, with the top 10 accounts controlling 71.99% of the total supply. While core mint and freeze authorities are revoked, indicating a fixed supply and unfreezable accounts, the concentrated ownership poses a substantial market manipulation risk. Third-party registry data on holder distribution was unavailable, but external security signals confirmed high concentration.

1 High
Volume 24h
$137.0K
Liquidity
$1.20M
Price
$0.008492
Token Age
1y
Top 10 Holders
76.9%

Security Findings

High

Holder Concentration > 70%

H-01Top 10 token accounts hold 71.99% of supply. Coordinated sell-off would crash price; single-whale dumps are common in this range. This is reinforced by third-party risk registry signals indicating 'Single holder ownership' and 'High holder concentration'.
IssueTop 10 token accounts hold 71.99% of supply. Coordinated sell-off would crash price; single-whale dumps are common in this range. This is reinforced by third-party risk registry signals indicating 'Single holder ownership' and 'High holder concentration'.
FixMonitor the distribution of tokens among holders closely. Significant transfers from large holders to exchanges could signal impending sell-offs. Consider the potential for market manipulation or sudden price drops due to concentrated ownership.
StatusUnresolved

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium5/10

The Ava AI (AVA) token operates on the classic spl-token program (v3), indicating a stable and well-understood token standard (7.1 Architecture). Both the mint authority and freeze authority have been revoked, ensuring no new tokens can be minted and no existing holder accounts can be frozen (7.3 Access Control). The token does not utilize any Token-2022 extensions that introduce new functionalities like permanent delegates, transfer hooks, or default frozen states, nor does it have mutable balance or transfer fee mechanisms (7.2 Code Security).

GovernanceHigh1/10

A primary economic risk (7.4 Economic) is the high holder concentration, with the top 10 token accounts holding 71.99% of the total supply. This level of concentration is flagged by a third-party risk registry as 'Single holder ownership' and 'High holder concentration', indicating potential for market manipulation or sudden price impact from large sell-offs. Despite this, the token exhibits healthy market activity with $1,131,896 in liquidity and a normal 24-hour volume to liquidity ratio of 0.42, suggesting organic trading rather than wash trading (7.6 External). The pair has been active for 636 days, providing a sufficient track record (7.5 Governance).

UpgradesMedium5/10

The token's upgradeability posture is robust (7.7 Upgrades). The mint authority is revoked, preventing any future supply changes. Similarly, the freeze authority is revoked, ensuring no accounts can be frozen or unfrozen post-launch. Furthermore, the token's metadata is immutable (`metadata_mutable: False`), meaning its name, symbol, or image cannot be altered after deployment. There are no active or mutable transfer fee or transfer hook extensions, eliminating potential for unexpected changes to transfer mechanics (7.8 Operations).

Security Checklist

Contract VerifiedFail
No Mint Function?
Liquidity LockedFail
Not a ProxyPass

Liquidity Depth

Show 3 more pairsShow less

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

LP Distribution

LP Burned99.2% · ≈ permanent lock

What Raised This Score

  • Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
  • Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
  • Contract source NOT verified
  • Top-10 concentration > 70% (76.9% total → 76.9% effective; 76.9% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — extreme)
  • Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)
  • 1 High finding(s) from audit

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Related Audits

Aliens are real (ALIENS)High RiskLOLHigh RiskKintara (KINS)High RiskSPCX69High RiskSolAngelesHigh Riskパンチ (PUNCH)High Risk

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Ava AI?

Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.

Get Detailed Audit