Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is Aura Final Boss a Scam?

KIMCHIBase
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 22, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 11h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.2% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.0% in contracts; 3.8% burned, locked or in pools excluded)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (11h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 224 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRetained
MintMintable
Liquidity lockUnknown
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 22, 20262,037 holders
80.0%Contracts16.2%Wallets3.8%
80.0%Contracts16.2%Wallets3.8%
ContractsWalletsBurnedBubble area = share of supply
100.0%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.0%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
  • Burnedout of circulation3.8%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads48.2%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 22, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 22$77.4K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensUnknown

Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.

Analysed pool$77.4KShare of depth100.0%

Security Findings

2 Medium5 Info
Medium

Centralized Minting Control

The owner can call updateMintRate and release to increase the total token supply. This allows the owner to dilute the holdings of all existing token holders at their discretion.CP-01

Issue

The owner can call updateMintRate and release to increase the total token supply. This allows the owner to dilute the holdings of all existing token holders at their discretion.

Fix

Implement a timelock for minting operations or move the minting authority to a decentralized governance DAO.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Centralized Transfer Control

The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to enable or disable token transfers. This gives the owner the power to freeze user assets or halt market activity entirely.CP-05

Issue

The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to enable or disable token transfers. This gives the owner the power to freeze user assets or halt market activity entirely.

Fix

Remove the ability to pause transfers or restrict this functionality to a decentralized emergency response committee.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 2,037 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 2,037 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

2,037 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

2,037 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $77K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $155K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $77K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $155K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $77K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $77K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 22
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities. The protocol utilizes a centralized ownership model where the owner holds significant power over token supply and transferability. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high degree of administrative control introduces centralization risks.

Technical8/10Low risk

The architecture leverages established OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, Votes, and Permit functionality. 7.1 Architecture is modular, and 7.2 Code Security is high due to the use of audited standard libraries. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via the Ownable pattern, though this creates a single point of failure. 7.6 External dependencies are limited to trusted standard contracts.

Governance3/10High risk

7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are heavily centralized under the contract owner. The owner can unilaterally mint tokens and halt transfers, which directly impacts token holder value. While minting is capped at 2% annually, the lack of a timelock or multi-sig requirement for these actions is a notable risk.

Upgrades4/10Medium risk

The contract is not upgradeable (7.7 Upgrades). 7.8 Operations are handled via direct owner calls. No proxy patterns are utilized, ensuring the logic remains immutable once deployed.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

To improve security, consider transitioning the ownership to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to prevent single-point-of-failure risks.

Implementing a timelock on sensitive functions like updateMintRate would provide transparency and allow the community to react to administrative changes.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkBase
Token age11h
Contract0x0a90…cbbe
Deployer0x9a9f…be97
Badge for your website
Aura Final Boss security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 22, 202656Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Aura Final Boss?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page