Is alon Safe? Smart Contract Security Analysis

Security Findings

1 Info

Info

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

I-01This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on LP lock/burn state, holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

IssueThis token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on LP lock/burn state, holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

FixRead the risk score breakdown below as the substance of this audit. For a code-level review, the token would need an accompanying verified program.

StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium6/10

The alon (ALON) token operates as a standard SPL token under the `spl-token` program. Both the Mint Authority and Freeze Authority are revoked, which means no new tokens can be minted and no existing token accounts can be frozen. The token is not configured with extensions such as default account state frozen, non-transferability, or balance mutability, indicating standard and predictable token behavior.

GovernanceHigh3/10

The token exhibits moderate holder concentration, with the top 10 accounts holding 20.79% of the total supply, which is below thresholds for high concentration risk. Liquidity is substantial at $663,204 USD, and the 24-hour trading volume is $5,234,428 USD. The Volume/Liquidity Ratio is 7.89, which is not indicative of wash trading (threshold > 20). The DEX pair has been active for 869 days, providing a long track record.

UpgradesMedium5/10

The alon (ALON) token mint has both its Mint Authority and Freeze Authority revoked, preventing any further changes to the token's supply or account freeze status. The metadata is also immutable, ensuring the token's name, symbol, and image cannot be altered post-launch. This configuration indicates a high degree of immutability for core token parameters, reducing upgrade-related risks.

Security Checklist

1/4 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

No Mint Function?

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

Liquidity Depth

$668.7K across 17 pairs

RaydiumSOLanalysed$659.9K Meteora DLMMSOL$6.7K Meteora DLMMSOL$582 Raydium CLMMSOL$325 Meteora DLMMSOL$296 Orca wpSOL$163

Show 4 more pairsShow less

Meteora DYNPawel$137 Meteora DYN2TBBB$136 Meteora DYN2Circuit$133 Meteora DYN2RNLD$126

The 7 remaining pairs hold $235 between them and are not listed.

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

LP Distribution

LP Burned100.0% · ≈ permanent lock

What Raised This Score

5 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 20% (25.2% total → 25.2% effective; 25.2% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — mild)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Is alon Safe?