Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
BNB ChainThe NftGatedBondingCurve contract implements a bonding curve mechanism restricted to specific NFT holders.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 20, 2026
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.
The functions buy(uint256), buyWithBNB(), and sell(uint256) allow specific NFT holders to mint or burn tokens, directly impacting the circulating supply. Because these functions are restricted to a specific group, they can effectively dilute the holdings of other participants by increasing the total supply at will.
Implement a global supply cap that cannot be exceeded by these functions. Consider adding a governance mechanism or a community-voting process to adjust supply-related parameters rather than allowing individual NFT holders to trigger minting events.
Unresolved
The ten largest holders own 21.3% of supply. Of that, 5.5% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 9.1% in wallets, 6.7% in other contracts. 1,204 holders in total.
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Acknowledged
1,204 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Acknowledged
100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Acknowledged
Liquidity $95K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.4M (DexScreener, all pools).
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Acknowledged
A community token whose value comes from attention rather than a product. Being a meme is not a risk in itself: it is scored on exactly the same contract and market facts as any other token. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: meme vocabulary in name/ticker (inu). Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $95K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Expect attention-driven volatility; the facts in this report say whether the contract itself can be used against holders.
Acknowledged
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Acknowledged
The NftGatedBondingCurve contract implements a bonding curve mechanism restricted to specific NFT holders. The architecture relies on a mathematical curve to determine token pricing and supply. While the core logic is protected against reentrancy, the protocol grants significant power to NFT holders to mint and burn tokens, which introduces economic dilution risks.
The contract utilizes OpenZeppelin's ReentrancyGuard to prevent common reentrancy attacks during buy/sell operations. 7.1 Architecture follows a standard bonding curve model, while 7.2 Code Security is maintained through strict input validation. 7.6 External interactions are limited to standard BNB transfers, which are handled with explicit success checks.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are tightly coupled to NFT ownership. The ability for privileged users to mint tokens via buy/sell functions creates a risk of supply inflation. This design choice prioritizes gated access over long-term token holder value stability.
7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy. The logic is immutable, which provides security against malicious logic updates but prevents patching if vulnerabilities are discovered. 7.8 Operations are restricted to the initial deployment configuration.
The protocol should implement a hard cap on the total supply to prevent excessive dilution by privileged NFT holders.
Additionally, consider introducing a time-lock or multi-signature requirement for any future changes to the bonding curve parameters to increase transparency and trust.
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page
