Is FIFA WORLD CUP (FWC) Safe? Smart Contract Security Analysis

Security Findings

1 Info

Info

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

I-01This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

IssueThis token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

FixRead the risk score breakdown below as the substance of this audit. For a code-level review, the token would need an accompanying verified program.

StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium6/10

The token is implemented using the spl-token-2022 program. Both the mint authority and freeze authority have been revoked, ensuring no new tokens can be minted and no accounts can be frozen by an external party. No transfer hook is active, meaning transfers are not subject to custom on-chain program logic. The default account state is not frozen, allowing immediate use of newly received tokens.

GovernanceHigh1/10

The token exhibits very low trading activity with a 24-hour volume of $31 against a liquidity of $13,224. The Volume/Liquidity Ratio is 0.00, indicating no signs of wash trading. The DEX pair has been active for 120 days, providing some track record. Holder concentration data was unavailable, preventing an assessment of supply distribution risk.

UpgradesMedium5/10

The token's core authorities, Mint Authority and Freeze Authority, are both revoked, preventing any post-launch changes to supply or account freeze status. No transfer hook is configured, and the metadata is immutable, ensuring that the token's name, symbol, or image cannot be altered. The token's configuration appears fixed and unchangeable by any single authority.

Security Checklist

1/4 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

No Mint Function?

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

Liquidity Depth

$8.0K

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

What Raised This Score

6 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 70% (86.3% total → 86.3% effective; 86.3% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — extreme)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)
Liquidity < $10k ($8,045 across 1 pairs — easily drained)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Is FIFA WORLD CUP Safe?